November 18 2018 / Rating: 2.7 / Views: 594

Elsevier with editor - Elsevier editor quits over restricted access Times Higher Education THE

If you could read, you d have noticed which of your posts I responded to.

Otherwise the status should change to with referee, and stay there for a while In usual cases, a Decision in process means that the editor of the journal has received the reviewer comments from all the referees. Include a list of key words not in the title, as well as a short title 8-word maximum. It means that the paper was written well and to the journals requirements.

I can easily see a role for a journal that publishes speculative biomedical papers. Trade names of drugs and other products must not appear in the article title. The reputation would decline if it began to publish articles of poor scientific merit whose claims brought unwelcome scrutiny to the journal. Available from This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. In reality, the modus operandi is please can you send me a pdf. But this policy shows, at least, the extent of Elsevier s robust profits on its research journals.

Nobody seems to read the papers a new hire writes they look for brand name markers on journals and affiliation, and go with that. All Tables should be numbered according to their sequence in the text of the manuscript., buying SSRN and selling other people s articles have happened in the last few months. Although the admin and the can be the same person which may mean the admin rejects the manuscript. Panter has also served as of the Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine and as a writing advisor for graduate students in the sciences. You are in the first-world of science top US university, nice brand recognition. I would do this myself if my chronic illness did not limit my energies.

Is it applicable to any journal in elsevier or journal to journal variation is there in waiting time in this particular status?

Over the next year, however, most libraries backed down and committed to Elsevier s contracts, and governments largely failed to push an alternative model for disseminating research. Finally, we include a contribution Oprescu describing the complex problem of assessing the pathogenicity of identified mutations in AARS genes and their relationship to human disease. To facilitate and data reuse, this journal also encourages you to share your software, code, models, algorithms, protocols, methods and other useful materials related to the project.

It allows you to feel the satisfaction of finding the answer without putting in any of the work required to do so. Having said that, the last nail in the coffin has to be IF I ll give you that a person working on these studies is found to be a crook. The Journal seeks original work which then undergoes peer-reviewed scrutiny with editorial oversight. Content Strategist Acquisitions Editor Former Employee Philadelphia, PA July 6, 2015 I was responsible for a split of UK contracts and US contracts.

The latest edition of his journal includes his paper Fuzzy knots in the fabric of spacetime and Dirac s vacuum fluctuation. Clearly that would be a huge underestimate but I could go with it. If you are concerned about students publishing in substandard journals, refer them to journal impact factor, readership, and scope etc.

The date might change to show that the case has been taken by the editor on those dates but a decision is yet to be taken! means working with journals to solve problems of the sort described in this post, and working with journals means sales.

Log in using your Editage account Registration takes less than a minute and provides the following benefits totally free Get personalized publication advice through our Q A forum Save your favorite content to your library Receive new published content directly in your mailbox View exclusive premium content without restriction Editage customer registered user? Two editors from the journal Biochemical Pharmacology explore research bias and its implications in. This practice would go against the core idea of academic publishing practice. Now why don t you try and read the full text and point out the flaws in the methodology and results. I submitted a paper 6 weeks or so ago, and these are the current statuses I ve seen Submission being processed Reviewers assigned Under review and now, about a month after that last status, back to Reviewers assigned Any idea what this means? Philip, Someone noted a single case of self plagiarism with Naschie, do you think there could be a bunch more, like in the emerald case?

Elsevier pulling their support to MH is merely the market being heard. Does this change the correctness of his accounting methods or invalidate his work.

By contrast, cutting ties with Elsevier has cost me virtually nothing so far.

Glassdoor Employers Community Work With Us Copyright 2008 2017, Glassdoor, Inc. In addition, the legend of the figure is misleading and libelous. According to the For the purposes of registration, a clinical trial is any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes. A list of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ICMJE-approved clinical trial registries and additional guidelines for registering RCTs are available at.

But when submitting your manuscript to a journal, you must ensure that you meet the required word count. If I have time in Dec, I might investigate to see if there is more.

Please refer to the References section for more information about data citation. Include statements even when the sponsor had no involvement in the above matters., or, following with editor, can it directly go for decision in progress accept? 1 The Ethics of Republishing A Case Study of Emerald MCB University Press Journals.

These figures are given to the Indeed users for the purpose of generalized comparison only. If the manuscript is accepted for publication, the disclosure statements will be published. Who will be sending papers to MSC and Zentrallblatt so that they are indexed?

Before you begin, it might be reasonable to ask what could be accomplished from this exercise since reuse of one s own text may not be considered scientific misconduct, especially if it is referenced and El Naschie is a heavy self-citer. This is what you have been asked to provide several times over several of your morphing troll names.

Isn t it a bit silly to think that your one-person boycott of Elsevier is going to have any meaningful impact?

Hi Akira I submitted a manuscript yesterday and besides the immidiate autogenerated submission confirmation I recived a mail that they had received my submission approximately 5 hours later. Joe, With so many articles, it may be easier to use a program like Turnitin. So while I don t think accepting an editorial position at an Elsevier journal makes anyone a bad person some of my best friends are editors for Elsevier! Is there any list or website explaine the time of the review for the journals? The first thing to point out is that there s a good chance your fears are at least somewhat and possibly greatly exaggerated. If such consent has not been obtained, personal details of patients included in any part of the paper and in any supplementary materials including all illustrations and videos must be removed before submission., a multinational publishing giant with annual revenues exceeding 6bn, was an investor s darling.

Not only that but he is also a Member of the Board of Trustees of the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies also in the University of Frankfurt. As for the Wakefield affair, yes the editors did ultimately decide, but it took the GMC ruling against Wakefield to get them to act. If it does, that means the reviewer has agreed to review the paper. Para la obtenci n de los datos se us dos tipos de instrumentos un cuestionario cerrado y un cuestionario de preguntas abiertas.

However, if its status changes to awaiting editorial decision, that likely means you can expect a decision of reject shortly, because the editor has elected not to send it out for review.

Large Company, Difficult to determine who to talk with to make things happen More Elsevier Media Communications salaries Average Salary Salary Distribution How much does a Editor make at Elsevier in the United States?

At some point the evidence accumulates to such a degree the doubters need to seriously reconsider whether their opinions are justified. Suddenly, where you published became immensely important. Your symbolic gesture seems hypocritical to me esp. I am sorry, may be I fail to understand what your concern could be? As of January 1, 2013, all new manuscripts for clinical trials must be registered prior to the enrollment of the first participant.

Your patronizing attitude towards the lower ranks of the organization is not so much hurtful as it is just plain insulting.

The main reasons they are rejected are Peter Thrower, PhD, is of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, and Professor Emeritus of Material Sciences and Engineering at Penn State University.

The best thing about all of the above action items with the possible exception of the last is that they require virtually no effort, and incur virtually no risk. Furthermore, the decision was that the controversial topics should receive extra scrutiny not that they should be banned altogether except in examples of hate speech, like racism. It is called Thanks Cosmin- I wasn t far off the mark I guessed how well this type of service would be received by the journals, and looking at the site, most of the journals I looked up have n a written by the bits of information volunteered by the editorial staff.

Tags: #elsevier editor, #elsevier with editor

New essay: