August 19 2018 / Rating: 9.8 / Views: 666

Discussion research paper - Writing a Research Paper Series Discussion- ScienceDocs

If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each them in the order they appeared as you gathered or analyzed the data. For that purpose, the traditional matching function is extended to incorporate labour market spending.

For full functionality of ResearchGate it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Educational researchers need to continue conducting empirical research to ascertain the factors that contribute to cheating amongst students. Relate this section to the first paragraph of the Discussion.

, rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru ca chapter s Figure 11.

Each paragraph begins with an indisputable introductory sentence about the topic to be discussed.

I frequently read that the study was limited by time, money, or other resources. Continue to be concise, using figures and tables, if appropriate, to present results most effectively. Avoid sudden introduction of new terms or ideas you must present everything in the introduction, to be confronted with your results here.

A sample of Suggestions for Further Research section is below.

East Midlands Research into Ageing Network EMRAN Discussion Paper Series. Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. So instead of simply summarizing your data and suggesting a few obvious follow-up studies, think about presenting your data in a novel way, showing how the work might resolve an existing controversy in the literature or explaining how it connects to an entirely different literature.

Anemia is a condition in which there is insufficient hemoglobin in the blood. We have demonstrated that treatment X is highly efficacious in our animal model of epithelial cancer. Research topics are often fluid, and dictated more by the student s ongoing research than by the original chosen topic. ca, itg 0, ity png, oh 2200, ou png, ow 1654, pt Electronic Health Research, rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru html, s, sc 1, th 259, tu q u003dtbn Kq8a9O0H tw 195 clt n, id isu Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings in the results section. If a study that you cited disagrees with your findings, don t ignore itclearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs., sc 1, st I was lost but now I live here- WordPress. jpg, ow 300, pt The agenda-setting challenges for virtual worlds a discussion paper, rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru com 2010 01 s, sc 1, st The Creative Shed, th 242, tu q u003dtbn tw 208 cb 9, cl 12, clt n, cr 9, ct 6, id isu

The final sentences should provide a strong finish In summary, our study shows that IL-6 induces the production of known inflammatory markers and appears to cause an increase in the size of lesions in mice.

Don t hesitate to ask people specifically for their views on some sections of this paper a gentle push may be needed to get started on discussing the specifics, but this can be fruitful. 2 Comparison of format and outcomes of traditional lecture-based and research paper-based teaching of cell biology. Getting everyone on the same page so to speak may often lead to the emergence of opinions because some people may have liked the way an idea analysis result was presented, yet it may not have been clear to others. An abstract, or summary, is published together with a research article, giving the reader a preview of what s to come., rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru org books

Whatever the case, without a clear conclusion section, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge your work and whether it merits publication in the journal. 4 Results and Discussion The discussion begins immediately after the results section ends. Often, you yourself will be surprised as to how badly it reads, so edit, edit, and edit.

We should also give information about our subject matter. Otherwise pre-peer review process can delay publication of the manuscript, and decrease motivation of the authors.

B Approaches to the writing process of the Discussion section 1. Everybody in Nigeria knows that schools need more materials and teachers need higher salaries Draw conclusions and make that are meaningful, unique, and relate to the results of the study. However, when looking for keywords, avoid words with a broad meaning and words already included in the title. End of the Introduction We therefore investigated vascular molecule VLM, and interleukin-6 IL-6 play a role in the vascular inflammation associated with disease or are just markers that reflect vascular inflammation.

04 The Foundations of James Buchanan s Work Exchange and Gains from Trade in all Aspects of Life, including Markets and Politics James E. PNG, ow 344, pt CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP Centre for Economic Policy Research, rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru org content s CEPR u0027s Discussion Papers have become effective tools to disseminate research the Centre u0027s conferences are, sc 1, st Centre for Economic Policy Research, th 242, tu q u003dtbn tw 208 cb 12, cl 21, clt n, cr 21, ct 12, id isu japstav. Expert Journals is a publishing division of Sprint Investify. This makes me think Then why should I care or believe anything you found, and want to stop reading right there, she says. What was your overall approach for studying the gap? Then and only then the most specialized among them might want to know the details of the work. Content Summarize your findings in text and illustrate them, if appropriate, with figures and tables. Obviously, you must refer to your results when discussing them, but focus on the interpretation of those results and their significance in relation to the research problem, not the data itself. Another similar advance that supports the potential benefit of IL-6 reduction is the development of tumor necrosis factor antagonists that have been effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis. Probably, the most important thing is to thank your funding agency or the agency giving you a grant or fellowship. For example, did the approaches differ or were there major differences in sample sizes that may have affected results? Hydration in Care Homes A series of focus groups in

Lots of possible variations here ONE way is to respond to the aims hypothesis in the order that they are stated in your Introduction.

Last Updated Oct 9, 2017 2 00 PM URL The Discussion- Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper- Research Guides at University of Southern California Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper 8.

Harrison JK, Gladman JRF, Van Der Wardt V, Conroy SP. Scientific papers typically have two audiences first, the referees, who help the journal editor decide whether a paper is suitable for publication and second, the journal readers themselves, who may be more or less knowledgeable about the topic addressed in the paper. During controlled experiments, we investigated the influence of the HMP boundary conditions on liver flows. Buchanan s Parable A Conjectural History of Private Property and a Perplexing Argument for Limits on the Market James E.

You may nevertheless find outside sources, and you should cite any articles that the instructor provides or that you find for yourself.

In order to make public as quickly as possible the results of theoretical research and policy analysis, discussion papers will be posted on our web site. To this end, it s important to use standard systems for numbers and nomenclature. jpg, ow 480, pt 16 How to write an article 111 discussion section and conclusion. Remove all redundancies such as studies on, the nature of, etc. We were able to improve the yield of transfected viruses 2-fold by adding 0. The justification of this approach is to see the missing aspects of the study and the manuscript writing methodology, and try to solve the relevant problems before completion of the study. Length of the manuscript Again, look at the journal s Guide for Authors, but an ideal length for a manuscript is 25 to 40 pages, double spaced, including essential data only.

After providing the broader context and framework, you should quickly go over the main methods, and the key results.

02 India s Evolving Food Economy and Trade Prospects for Australia and New Zealand 09. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice if appropriate.

Discussion Papers 2006- 2016 This series contains work in progress at the School of Economics and Finance, Massey University. If a study that you cited disagrees with your findings, don t ignore itclearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs.

Indian J Radiol Imaging serial online 2007 cited 2017 Nov 1 17 148-9.

Either you have uncovered something new, or you may have made a major flaw with the. Additional findings major and minor can be described in subsequent paragraphs., rid rmt 0, rt 0, ru com file 21449637 s Background image of page 1, sc 1, st Course Hero, th 256, tu q u003dtbn 9I tw 197 cb 21, cl 3, clt n, cr 3, ct 3, id isu www2.

Tags: #discussion research, #research

Random essay: